|
|
|
Artifactual Evidence from the Broaddus Flats
Site (44Hn254)
by Tom Hobbs
“It’s not the things they left
behind, it’s the things they did that counts…”
—Ivor Noel Hume in the video, Search For a Century
Note: Click on images to view them larger
and to read a description.
Nails and Windows
From
the very outset of this archaeological excavation in 1992, artifacts
flowed into the laboratory. The vast majority of these were, of
course, iron rose head nails generally in two
sizes—3” multi-purpose, with a large rose head and
spatula tip, and 1.5” siding nails, again with the spatula
tip. The mere quantity of these latter nails convinced us in a
few short months that we were dealing with a post-and-beam structure
with clapboard or riven-oak siding. Later colonists may have confiscated
much of the brick and hardware from the burned ruin, but many
of the nails must have escaped detection. In a typical 10’
square of topsoil (12” deep) near or on the house site,
excavators typically sift out one full bag (no fewer than 650).
During
the first few months of work, we were also able to determine that
the windows were casement type. In a typical
square, excavators sifted out several partially-burned and twisted
lead strips used to hold the small glass panes in place. Window
glass is generally in poor condition, especially after being beat
around by the plow for 250 years. However, in the rubble-filled
basement discovered in 1994, diggers recovered the disarticulated
lead and glass remains of at least one window and the two well-made
iron props that held them open. Lying up against
the west wall of the cellar, we recovered an entire triangular
pane measuring 7” x 4”. A couple of broken
iron hinges recovered in the cellar may have served on
one of these windows, but they were perhaps left in the ruins
of the house because of their condition. No attempt has been made
yet to unravel one of the lead strips to discover a date stamped
on the interior wall of the lead. This yet-unexplained process
was done by the window artisans back in England and has often
helped American archaeologists in their quests to find a terminus
post quem for the date of manufacture of such windows. The author
is almost certain of the construction date for the house (1690s),
so dating of the window lead is not deemed essential at the present
time.
1
| 2 | 3|
4 | 5
| 6 | 7
Next>>
Top
|